First, let me start this blog off by saying, to quote screenwriter, William Goldman, “Nobody knows anything.”
That would certainly apply to me when it comes to Jungian thought. The subject is so vast, the knowledge and education needed to engage the subject so far beyond what I’ve acquired, that it’s just silly. Clearly, I don’t know anything. But who cares? I want to play and, in the process, learn. My education in the subject consists of personal readings, individual workshops, one course, “Experiencing Jung” at the Jung Institute in Los Angeles, and two weekend conferences, Myths of L.A. with John Beebe (among other speakers) and In Defense of Jung with James Hillman, who wrote The Soul’s Code, and many other titles.Even though my knowledge of Jung’s writings is limited, my curiosity isn’t. So, join me in playing with the Jungian concepts here. Just because we can’t throw a fast ball a 100 miles-
-an-hour doesn’t mean we can’t pitch.
I hope respected Jungian analysts as well as mystery lovers and anyone drawn to this fascinating subject matter will post to this blog.
Well, here goes: let me throw you a change-up.
It’s Out of Your Hands
I’ll begin this blog with a few quotes from C.G. Jung’s book, Aspects of the Feminine, translated by R.F.C. Hull, page 78, from the chapter, Anima and Animus.
A man counts it a virtue to repress his feminine traits as much as possible, just as a woman, at least until recently, considered it unbecoming to be “mannish.” The repression of feminine traits and inclinations naturally causes these contrasexual demands to accumulate in the unconscious. No less naturally, the imago of woman (the soul image) becomes a receptacle for these demands, which is why a man, in his love-choice, is strongly tempted to win the woman who best corresponds to his own unconscious femininity—a woman, in short, who can unhesitatingly receive the projection of his soul.
Jung goes on to say that it might turn out that “The man has married his own worst weakness.” I looked up imago in the dictionary, couldn’t find it, but under image, it gave imago as a Latin root, related to imitari, IMITATE. The first definition: a reproduction of the appearance of someone or something. Jung says that someone, in a man, is his mother. In a woman, her father.
The next quote is anecdotal and comes from that (albeit dated) purveyor of homogenized cultural knowledge, Werner Erhard, founder of the est Training:
It’s already happened.
That was the piece of information I was supposed to say “I got it” to after I’d spent two weekends in 1980, forbidden to piss, and spending $300. In other words, your career choices, your choice of mate, creative art—in fact, everything—has already been decided.
As far as your mate goes, I often look back and wonder how in the world I chose a woman who is as angry as I am. In fact, my wife and I are so alike in our vulnerabilities and negative character traits that it’s hard not to feel strongly when either of us is hurt—especially by the other. The saving grace is that we have different positive traits, perspectives, strengths and interests that help us bridge that forceful, electric soul similarity, that sparking wire that connects us at the anima and animus.
How does this apply to the mystery novel, particularly, my novel, Animus? Well, my main character, Gar Moody, is haunted by the suicide of a lover and tormented by a kidnapper who he can’t decide is a man or woman. He begins to believe he’s tracking the animus of a woman—since the energy is aggressive and forceful. Not until the end does he realize it’s a dance between his own anima and something very different.
Why would this be a compelling plot point in a mystery novel? Just think of it: if you look at Jung’s quote above, he’s saying that repressing our contrasexual characteristics makes them accumulate in the unconscious. He also says in other writings that, in affect, the shadow—that which is denied and unseen in our own consciousness—can take on a personality of its own. Can you think of anything more frightening? Think of the hosts bursting out of the abdomens of the inhabitants of the ship in Alien. Except you don’t have to be in space; they burst out around the water cooler, across the dinner table, in the bedroom.
What could be more mysterious? And where would a Jungian detective start?
Hi Joe,
Great website!
Reading my second book on Jung called “Jung: On Synchronicity and the Paranormal.” Have also read “Jung: A Very Short Introduction”. One of his more compelling concepts for me is the one he calls “Synchronicity” and what Buddhism would call “Simultaneity of Cause and Effect”.
Thank you. I love the connection between Buddhism and Jung. And as you pointed out, late in life Jung starts drawing his own mandalas as the ultimate expression of the self. Thx for commenting!
Ah, Joe, you make me feel so Jung!
The Ellis Rabb story was wonderful and touching and a stunning example of synchronicity turning the corner and bumping into simultaneity? And your opening disclaimer, joining William Goldman, a quote I’ve relished through the years, as we trudge along often trying to find
meaning in the quicksand, but it’s a wonderful welcoming intro to both Jung and your curiosity and your mysterious journeying. But, Joe, how do you find time for this and emails and twitters and – oy – your writing, your work, your family et al – ? You definitely must have worked something out with Murphy’s Law – with all you’re doing, time has expanded to make sure you continue to do all you’re doing – ! I probably won’t come visit again ( tho I’ll be tempted) but thanks for this, Joe, and good luck with the blog and the detective novel, my best, Garrett–
I’ve recently gotten into the Seth Speaks series….
Seth contends that everything is happening now.. that there really is not time or space…
If one thinks long enough about the concepts of eternity and the land of tranquil light one feels compelled to agree.
Taking this a step further, when the LS says there is no distinction between us and the rest of the universe the same concept gets echoed.
What this means for us, IMO, is that we are the universe 24/7/365. We create our reality 24/7/365.
We have chosen to enter this dimension for some reason that still eludes me somewhat. Buddhism and Seth both say we choose our existences to learn lessons.